<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SGA candidates debate before polls open Tuesday</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thetowerlight.com/2012/04/sga-candidates-debate-before-polls-open-tuesday/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thetowerlight.com/2012/04/sga-candidates-debate-before-polls-open-tuesday/</link>
	<description>Towson’s campus and community news source</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 07:46:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Absolutely Sewious</title>
		<link>http://www.thetowerlight.com/2012/04/sga-candidates-debate-before-polls-open-tuesday/comment-page-1/#comment-112683</link>
		<dc:creator>Absolutely Sewious</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2012 02:04:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thetowerlight.com/?p=47533#comment-112683</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I love this year&#039;s lack of substance in the SGA campaigns. It lets me feel warm, fuzzy, and involved in my campus without thinking about anything more than which name I like the most. I yearn for the day when SGA tickets dispense with platforms, missions, and vision statements in favor of the pragmatic approach: name-only campaigns.

VOTE TowsonLove
CHOOSE TigerPotential

Each year, the leadership of the SGA will create a new &quot;fund&quot; with a catchy name and an increasingly irrelevant directorship for the cabinet. Freed from the demands placed on them by realistic campaign promises and a connection to campus needs, the SGA will be able to fall into relative obscurity, beautifully reflecting the apathy of the students that it serves.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love this year&#8217;s lack of substance in the SGA campaigns. It lets me feel warm, fuzzy, and involved in my campus without thinking about anything more than which name I like the most. I yearn for the day when SGA tickets dispense with platforms, missions, and vision statements in favor of the pragmatic approach: name-only campaigns.</p>
<p>VOTE TowsonLove<br />
CHOOSE TigerPotential</p>
<p>Each year, the leadership of the SGA will create a new &#8220;fund&#8221; with a catchy name and an increasingly irrelevant directorship for the cabinet. Freed from the demands placed on them by realistic campaign promises and a connection to campus needs, the SGA will be able to fall into relative obscurity, beautifully reflecting the apathy of the students that it serves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
