Home » Columns, Opinion

Capitol Showdown: Should the federal government enact stricter gun control laws?

27 January 2013 5 Comments

The National Rifle Association of America, NRA, was established in 1975. The Institute for Legislative Action, ILA, is the lobbying body of the NRA. Both associations believe in exercising their rights from the Second Amendment to the Constitution: “a well regulated Militia…security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”
People use guns in order to protect themselves, correct? Is a gun the only way a person can kill another person? The simple answer is no.
Joe Biden may say we need stricter gun control laws, but guns are not the only way people can kill. Guns are needed for protection from other objects used to killed people. Making gun laws stricter will only make it harder for the “good” guys to obtain guns while making it still just as available for the “bad” guys to obtain guns and other lethal objects.
Realistically speaking, if a person wants to commit a murder, then stricter gun laws will not prevent them. A gun may be a weapon, but there are other weapons such as knifes that are capable of a taking a life. What about a mass murder? Do guns make it easy to kill many? Let’s put this into perspective. Lately, there have been many unfortunate events involving deaths of many children, students, and teachers at school shootings.
What if the shooter of these events knew that the administrators and teachers also had a weapon (gun) to protect themselves and foremost, their students? Would the shooter have been able to commit the mass murder?
The perspective and lesson out of the example is that “bad” people will always be able to obtain weapons, as addressed earlier. It is the “good” people that need to protect themselves from the corrupt society we live in.
If the federal government wants to enforce stricter gun laws, then they are only enforcing stricter laws for the “good” people. If the teachers and administrators had guns to protect themselves and their students, more lives would have been saved versus lost because of guns. The fact of the matter is that the society we live in cannot be dependent on the federal government for personal protection.
I do believe there should be laws set in place such as age and a screening test, but if a person is of age and can shoot a gun, without harming others, then the person should have every right to protect themselves from the murderers. Mass shootings and killings need to stop and it is time for the “good” people to make it more difficult for “bad” people to commit these shootings.

– Rachel Eldringhoff, Towson College Republicans

Share on Twitter
Print this page

5 Comments »

  • Larry McDevitt said:

    Nice article–but the N.R.A. was established in 1871—not 1975!

  • ken8bart said:

    how do you differen8 between “good” people and “bad” people effectively tho? it’s that thing americans are not well versed in i believe.

  • Earl said:

    God guns and guts are what made this country great. GIve all three to everyone and violence ends.

  • Wayne said:

    Guns dont kill people, people kill people

  • reader said:

    Guns don’t kill people. People with guns kill people.

Leave your response!

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

Formatting help »

By posting a comment you acknowledge and accept the following policy. Any material published on TheTowerlight.com may be used in the print edition. The Towerlight reserves the right to remove any comment from our website at any time for any reason. Online comments do not reflect the views of The Towerlight.