myspace counters
College Media Network - Search the largest news resource for college students by college students

Assistant field hockey coach John Kovach arrested

Possession of child pornography

By Pete Lorenz

Print this article

Published: Monday, March 16, 2009

Updated: Monday, March 16, 2009

Assistant field hockey coach John Kovach was arrested Monday for possession of child pornography, according to a Baltimore County Police report.

Kovach, 52, engaged in conversation with a retired detective from Los Angeles who posed as a 13-year-old girl in late February. This sparked an investigation of Kovach, which included a search of his home that resulted in the discovery of multiple samples of child pornography as well as a handgun that was accessible to a minor who lived at the residence.

Kovach had served as an assistant coach at Towson for six seasons and has coached youth programs for many years. He ran the highly regarded Mater Amoris Ocelots club team where he coached with Tigers’ star Christina Boarman when she was in high school. His profile has been removed from the Towson Tigers Web site.

Kovach began the Ocelots under-12 co-ed field hockey program, which operates out of the Mater Amoris Montessori School in Ashton, Md., 10 years ago. Graduates of the program have gone on to play for schools such as Duke, Northwestern and Stanford.

Kovach also spent time as an assistant coach for the University of Virginia during one of the team’s most successful runs. The Cavaliers reached the Final Four four times with Kovach aboard, and achieved their first ever No. 1 ranking in the national polls.

The police report stated that Kovach was arrested at Mater Amoris, and that he admitted afterward to his preference of viewing young girls between the ages of 9 and 13. He has apparently used several AOL Instant Messenger screen names in the past in attempt to converse with young girls on the Internet.

With Kovach on staff, the Tigers made their second straight conference tournament appearance this fall losing to Old Dominion, 5-1, in the first round.

Kovach is being held at the Baltimore County Detention Center on $250,000 bond.

Comments

113 comments
Your name
Fri Mar 20 2009 15:52
I just get tired of all the comments that make it appear as if the headmistress is beyond critique or improvement. "she will always have our full support" "impeccable integrity", "terrific". "always puts the kids first" Nobody is without flaws, the headmistress included.
Your name
Fri Mar 20 2009 15:20
To "a question" - His mother (the headmistress of the school) posted bail - she has protected him over seeing to the safety of the children at her school.
a question
Fri Mar 20 2009 14:27
If the main concern is the safety of the kids, why would anyone post bail for him?
Your name
Fri Mar 20 2009 13:49
He's out on bail, does anyone know where he is physically located?
@Moral Observer
Thu Mar 19 2009 21:53
Obviously? Nothing is obvious on the internet, as proven by the fact that the coach was caught because someone was POSING. If it was obvious, he wouldn't have gotten caught.
If anything is obvious here, it's that the parents hate him as much as the kids likely do. And rightfully so. Just don't go jumping to conclusions.
Moral Observer
Thu Mar 19 2009 21:33
To: As a longtime friend of [sic] Towerlight staff members,

Hopefully the Balt. Co. Police are surveying this site so they can obtain information on those who post comments such as this:

unknown Tue Mar 17 2009 08:55 i hate him

Obviously, it was written by a child who had some type of negative experience with him.

So, as a responsible adult, I will forward the comment to the investigative officer.

sad but not surprised
Thu Mar 19 2009 18:35
My two children had good experiences at MA also...but my radar about Coach K went off very soon after meeting him. By the time my daughter was in second grade, I was sure I did not want her any where near him...one day he did something to her that was a BIG RED FLAG....he made a big production of taking her from her classroom ..acting like he had some special treat for her...he then took her into the bathroom to allegedly try some field hockey gear on her...my daughter told me about this situation, and said she felt weird around him...nothing more happened...but she never played field hockey for him...I had no proof of anything..but this incident made me wonder about him....the arrest did not surprise me...but saddened me because it might just ruin a great school.
no one needs to know...
Thu Mar 19 2009 17:46
I go to the school that he worked at, and I don't that the staff was responsible for this and what he did; but the staff didn't want to send out any notices because they didn't know all of the facts yet. If you pull your children out of the school for that, I think it is a bad choice, and your being a nuthead. It isn't the schools fault for what he did, and he is away from the students now, so who cares if your children still go?! He is out of their reach, and he can't hurt your child now.
This is NOT a TU site!
Thu Mar 19 2009 17:37
"This is a Towson University site -- is this the only place you can air your concerns? What you say can be seen by children."
"If it is only a Towson site than it should not be on the www for comments. Maybe Towson folks should have passwords so the general populace is not on this site.
Parents should watch what their children see on the web. The news article is more damaging than our thoughts.
Sorry...but...we are here. "
Hey, guys. As a longtime friend Towerlight staff members, let me clarify something for you: The Towerlight is NOT, I repeat: NOT, a Towson University-affiliated newspaper. They are a completely non-profit organization and have control of the entire publication. This is not a public relations machine for TU. This is a legitimate twice-weekly newspaper.
The Sun or the Post would allow these same kind of comments. Don't complain because it's published by TU students. They aren't children, and neither is the majority of their readership.
Other newspapers can be seen and commented on by the general populace. Don't shoot the messenger when its your own arguments and concerns that are displaying the sharp words.
Reply to Towson only
Thu Mar 19 2009 17:27
If it is only a Towson site than it should not be on the www for comments. Maybe Towson folks should have passwords so the general populace is not on this site.
Parents should watch what their children see on the web. The news article is more damaging than our thoughts.
Sorry...but...we are here.
Moral Observer
Thu Mar 19 2009 16:47
This is a Towson University site -- is this the only place you can air your concerns? What you say can be seen by children. I believe that the person who wrote the following comment may be a little closer to the situtation than you realize. In addition, Mr. Kovach has a daughter who can read this site. Maybe the MA people should have a private meeting to discuss their feelings.

unknown Tue Mar 17 2009 08:55 i hate him

Gee I wonder why?

Wondering
Thu Mar 19 2009 16:45
What did the letter say? Include? Was it to only present families?
x
Thu Mar 19 2009 16:36
@let's be reasonable
John could have, should have been removed. He has now been fired, late but he is gone now.
Most parents probably did not know about the DUI since the parents that did know gossiped amongst themselves. Sure some may have told the school, but when the school didn't act, the parents did nothing. By not calling the authorities, they were complicit in endangering children as well. If my child had been hurt, believe me I would have been mad at the school and anyone that had the info and did not share it with me.
Charlotte does not have anymore children to show special attention to (that seems to be the gripe, that he was shielded because he was Charlotte's son) - I don't expect an employee to be "protected" again. That bunch of women left at the school better toe the line or they are out of there. Let's fingerprint them too.
Current parents received a letter in the mail yesterday. A meeting has been set up for parents to meet with Charlotte and staff to discuss John's arrest.
The only reason he was probably left at the school after the affair was to continue the field hockey program. If we didn't have field hockey, my guess is that he would not have been there.

I get the feeling that some people have an axe to grind about stuff that happened a long time ago. I think the stuff that has happened in the last 10 days in what we should be dealing with. The fact that Charlotte may not have listened to past complaints because he was her son has been BEAT TO DEATH. We get it.

Let's be reasonable
Thu Mar 19 2009 16:09
Happy Parent made some very good points. You stated that he has been removed from the classroom. But the concern still remains as to why he was still there in any position. He had an affair with the parent of a student. Isn't there a "morals clause" in the teacher contracts? Or does it not matter when the headmistress is your mother? He had a DUI but was still permitted to drive young girls to games. What were those parents thinking?
Cathy Lindberg-Tang addresses the issue that the letter still has not gone out to parents. Over a week after the arrest was made on the school grounds? Current parents, in particular, should be furious. As small as the school population is, those parents deserved personal phone calls; instead, they are still waiting for an official announcement of what they heard on the news and read on the internet. Cathy directs them to where they can get form letters, but the school could and should have sent a letter immediately after the arrest telling parents the information they had to hear on the news. That could have then been followed up with more details and resources for assistance. The school needs to step up - ignoring the matter makes it appear that Charlotte wants to protect John by not putting information out there.
Cathy Lindberg-Tang, Esq/
Thu Mar 19 2009 15:17
I spoke to Marsha Perez yesterday and as an attorney I told her that Charlotte needs to call the Board of Ed and see the policy for matter of this concern. I told her that the police dept. as well as the Board of Ed could help guide them with an accurate letter. I told Marsha that if I were legal counsel I would get the letters out to ALL EXISTING AS WELL AS PAST families including in the letter the screen names that John had. Charlotte is not liable unless she "knew or should have known" that he was engaging in such conduct. She is an intelligent woman. I am sure she would have immediately removed him from the premises. She has a mixed helmet right now- mother to John and caretaker to the children. Criminal background checks are done on individuals who become school employees, teachers, coaches....many get fingerprinted. I know that Sister Eileen at Pallotti Day Care was fingerprinted every year....
Marsha mentioned that the letter was being formulated.
Sad time for everyone.
Good police work. Pedophiles are like weeds. You get rid of some and then more pop up.
Jamie Perez and my daughter know the ins and outs of pedophiles. My older son was taken in 1984 by a crazy person. He was taken off my porch while eating a sandwich. Fortunately he was discovered...Casey and Jamie went to sleep with a poster of John Walsh hanging above their headboard. I made them watch America's Most Wanted. I can't believe that I was dropping them off at school in the midst of one.
For the parent who suggested castration- courts will sometimes recommend "chemical castration" wherein testosterone inhibiters are administered with a lace of estrogen. Johns Hopkins studies show that only a reduction of the propensity for children occurs. The "syndrome" is not curable.
Cathy Lindberg-Tang, Esquire
wondering
Thu Mar 19 2009 14:53
How has the school handled things since the arrest? How informative was the letter sent home? What if anything will be changed about the way the school is run moving forward?
Former Parent
Thu Mar 19 2009 14:40
Thnak you Happy Parent. You make complete sense! Rational. Intelligent.
Former MA Parent
Thu Mar 19 2009 14:37
To all the MA families past and present I do not condone, want to justify or even understand what John has done. We need to stop verbally slapping others who are sharing their experience when it is different from our own and we may not agree with. You need to realize that each one of us has had very different experiences with John, some good and some bad. We are all trying to put our past with him together with the man that would do this. For some this is easier than others and we need to respect that. We should be supporting not attacking each other. Only with support and understanding of each other will we and most importantly our children begin to heal. We would do better to turn our anger to the bigger picture at hand. We as parents and society are playing a role in these terrible acts against children. We would never allow or 9, 10, 11…..year old to roam the mall alone, it is too dangerous. We would never hand over the keys to our car to them because they lack the training, maturity and responsibility for it to be safe. We have all heard stories like this and much worse, yet as a society we continue to (at a younger and younger age) hand over tools to our children, like the internet and phones with cameras, that we know to be so dangerous and destructive. Don’t the reasons I listed above apply to these tools. Maybe there should be age restrictions, mandatory safety classes, I don’t know but this is where our anger and efforts would be better placed.
Happy Parent
Thu Mar 19 2009 12:10
To Past Parents Who Are Outraged - I hear and understand your frustration that your concerns about John were not listened to. What was going on in the upper junior classroom 2 years ago was wrong. But most of us at the school now do not have the same experiences as you. John has not been involved at the school on a day to day basis for for 2 years. Rumor has it that he was removed from daily teaching because of the affair he had with a parent - the timing is right. Sure he was still there a couple of afternoons a week for PE/field hockey practice, but my kids have had limited contact with him. I don't want them around him at all now, but he has been FIRED so that won't be a problem. He will not be teaching my kids again. There is no explaining or justifying the crimes John has been charged with and I want John punished for his crimes. By law, Charlotte will not be allowed to allow him on campus even if she wanted to. I can't imagine that my kids won't be SAFE and HAPPY there with the current teachers and staff. Those who have not been on campus in a couple years, let me tell you the atmoshere is different without him in the classroom on a daily basis. Even though my kids only had him for PE at that time, I was glad when he was no longer teaching daily because I too had heard enough through the grapevine to make me worried (about his teaching, coaching style). What happened in the past was wrong - John should have been removed sooner - and nothing the school does now can change that fact, but the problem has been removed. I would like to move past it and feel that most current parents do too. I'm sure in the future, I going to get ticked off at MA for some communication problem, their unwillingness to change things, etc. but overall the school has been a good experience for my kids. I respect the fact that parents with older kids had a worse experience that I have had, but please respect us parents whose children were "spared" the worse of John's behavior and may have a different perspective. I get the sense that some the people who don't have kids there now, won't be happy until they see John and Charlotte hanged, and the school closed.
Your name
Thu Mar 19 2009 11:35
To a Completely Dumbfounded Parent
Im sure your closet is full of skeletons and if you or a family member got a DUI or had an affair, I am sure you would do everything in your power to counsel that person, get them professional help, and I know you would not want to lose your job over an affair or a DUI. So before you cast stones at everyone else, you best look in the mirror and ask your self, if I had a DUI or a mistress, what would I do. This case is about the children, you have no idea what steps were taken to help John with alcohol or infidelity. The pornography is unacceptable and should not be tolerated, but I guarantee you know someone who has had a DUI, an affair, has had no inapproiate contact with childred, and you support them fully.






log out